dSLR Dad

Popular Photography Magazine has published their review of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens:

The first DX Nikkor with the classic advantages of a high-speed “normal” lens…

(more…)

Photozone has published their review of the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G dSLR lens:

Normal primes have a long standing reputation of high quality for an affordable price and the Nikkor AF-S 50 makes no exception in this regard. The lens is able to deliver ver sharp images, at least slightly stopped down.
However it’s not without flaws. Wide open, it lacks a bit sharpness and most of all contrast, vignetting is very high wide open, but that is to be expected on a full frame camera with a moderately priced fast prime. The bokeh is smooth from f/2 to f/2.8 onwards, but a bit nervous wide open, where the lens also shows considerable amount of LoCAs

(more…)

Popular Photography Magazine has published their lens test report of the Sigma APO 50-150mm F2.8 II EX DC HSM:

Rest on its laurels? Not Sigma. Just look at the updated version of its bright 50–150mm f/2.8 digital-only (DC) zoom ($675, street), part of the company’s top-drawer EX family of glass. Its predecessor performed admirably in the Pop Photo Lab just two years ago (January 2007). Since then, the company’s engineers have twisted, squeezed, and tweaked its design in an attempt (we’re guessing) to catch up to the optical superiority of Tokina’s remarkable 50–135mm f/2.8.

(more…)

Popular Photography Magazine has published their review of the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G dSLR lens:

(more…)

Imaging Resource has published their review of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens:

The 35mm ƒ/1.8G DX fills an obvious hole in Nikon’s lineup, and with its very reasonable price point Nikon may have found a way to ride out the recession. In our tests, the lens performs very well, with good results for sharpness at ƒ/1.8, becoming excellent at ƒ/2.8. Chromatic aberration is visible but not overly objectionable and light falloff is nicely controlled. Distortion is a little high for our tastes, especially if the lens is to be marketed as a ‘’standard” lens. But for the money you can’t beat it, especially if what you’ve had to work with has been an 18-55mm kit zoom.

You can read the complete review at SLR Gear.  As always, you can find more news and reviews at the dSLR Dad Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens Resource Guide.

Digital Photography Review has published their review of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens:

The AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G DX is a lens which certainly caused a degree of dismay on its release, with many Nikon fans disappointed by the decision to make it compatible with the DX format only. However the main benefit of that decision is plain for all to see – even at its introductory price the lens costs rather less than the venerable AF-Nikkor 35mm F2.0D, despite the addition of an AF-S motor to allow autofocusing on Nikon’s entry-level D40 / D40X / D60 bodies. It’s also less than half the price of the few other DX format standard primes currently on the market (such as the Pentax 35mm F2.8 Macro, Tokina 35mm F2.8 Macro and Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM), so Nikon has managed with this lens to produce the first genuinely inexpensive (sub-$200) fast standard prime designed specifically for digital SLRs.

(more…)

Imaging Insider has completed their review of the smc PENTAX DA Star 55mm F1.4 SDM Prime Lens:

There isn’t much to add that we haven’t already covered: excellent results for sharpness, great resistance to CA, little to no corner shading or distortion. Quick and silent autofocus; rounded aperture blades; and to top it all off, a great lens hood that you probably won’t even need given the lens’ shrouded design. Pentax has produced a fantastic lens with the 55mm ƒ/1.4 DA*, however the only sticking point could be its high price point: at over $700, it’s one of the most expensive 50mm-style lenses of any manufacturer. Based on our test results however, you definitely get your money’s worth.

You can read the entire review over at SLR Gear.com.

Photozone has published their review of the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens. They have reviewed 24-105mm f/4L lens before on an APS-C sensor.  Now they have taken a look through the viewfinder of a full-frame Canon EOS 5D Mark II:

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 USM L IS is surely one of the better standard zoom lenses for full format EOS DSLRs but it’s not perfect within this scope nonetheless. The resolution figures are generally very decent except for a pronounced border softness at 70mm @ f/4. Neither distortions nor vignetting are something to rave about at 24mm although these are no real issue at other focal lengths. Lateral CAs can be visible at times but the problem is generally well controlled (relative to other lenses in its class). The quality of the bokeh (@ 105mm) is very usable – within the limits of a lens with a moderate max. aperture. As to be expected from a modern Canon L lens the construction quality is up to pro standards. The AF is exceptionally fast, accurate near silent. The image stabilizer works well within its specifications although some may miss a panning mode which is implemented in Canon’s IS L tele lenses. The EF 24-105mm is a pricey lens but also a substantial one.

You can read the entire review over at Photozone.

Imaging Resource has published their review of the Sony SAL-1118 DT 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 Super Wide-Angle Zoom Lens:

The Sony DT 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 is respectably sharp in the central region of the frame, even when used wide open, but its design produces corner softness and barrel distortion. Chromatic aberration is quite high, even for a wide-angle lens, and its lack of a modern autofocus motor makes it somewhat slow to focus, and noisy.

It’s hard to recommend the Sony 11-18mm with the newer, better-performing and less expensive Sigma 10-20mm ƒ/4-5.6 lens hovering on the sidelines. As well, Tamron’s own 11-18mm ƒ/4.5-5.6 exists as another budget alternative, not to mention the older Konica-Minolta version; there are plenty of ways to get the performance this lens offers, without spending top dollar. But for the brand-loyal, the 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 offers pleasing wide-angle performance.

You read the complete review at SLR Gear.com.

Imaging Resource has published their review of the Sony SAL-100M28 100mm f/2.8 Macro Lens:

When mounted on the A700, the Sony 100mm ƒ/2.8 macro provided excellent results almost across the board; the only possible objection would be that it wasn’t tack-sharp at ƒ/2.8, but at 1.5 blur units, to ask for more would be very demanding. The 24-megapixel sensor of the A900 taxes the optics of the 100mm macro quite heavily, requiring some level of stopping-down to get the best results (our optimum setting being at least ƒ/5.6, if not ƒ/8 for the absolute sharpest).

Otherwise, distortion is non-existent, chromatic aberration is well handled, and there is virtually no light falloff. Focus handling options are very good, making the lens an excellent platform for macro work.

You can read the entire review at SLR Gear.